How the us congress was drastically changed in 1994 for the first time in 40 years

Chapter 02 - The Constitution The Problem of Liberty In the decade that preceded the Revolutionary War, most American colonists believed that they could obtain certain liberties and still be a part of the British Empire, liberties such as:

How the us congress was drastically changed in 1994 for the first time in 40 years

Austin Anderson [1] Introduction Graduate students across the country are often required to complete a set amount of hours working as a graduate assistant in order to earn their degree.

How the us congress was drastically changed in 1994 for the first time in 40 years

These graduate assistant hours are typically earned by working as either a research assistant or a teaching assistant, depending on which type of program the student is enrolled in. The most intriguing question that arises is whether these students should be considered employees as defined under the National Labor and Relations Act.

The distinction is an important one; classifying graduate students as employees would grant them rights and privileges that other types of employees are entitled to, most notably the right to enter collective bargaining agreements to negotiate for less required hours and university health insurance.

Inthe Board seemed to end the dispute once and for all when it ruled affirmatively that students were not employees under the NLRA.

A conservative board would likely have no problem overruling a liberal board, and vice versa. This, coupled with the fact that NLRB decisions are only somewhat binding precedent even if affirmed by a federal circuit court, [11] means that there is no clear indication that the court will stop overruling itself at any time in the near future.

The NLRB is simply not fit to create a final, lasting precedent from a procedural standpoint. The original Act was passed in[13] and has not been significantly altered by Congress since the passing of the Landrum-Griffin Act in The unique relationship between universities and their graduate students as they operate today was very likely not foreseen or contemplated when the NLRA was drafted or last amended.

How the us congress was drastically changed in 1994 for the first time in 40 years

Aside from being the only legitimate avenue for endorsing a specific reading of the National Labor Relations Act, Congress is the entity best equipped to decide such a complex and far-reaching issue. Inthere were overstudents employed by their universities in a teaching assistant role.

Students and universities both make compelling arguments advancing their positions. Students point to the fact that teaching assistants often fill roles that would otherwise have to be filled by adjunct faculty which are considered employees.

Part One briefly explains the procedural structure of the National Labor Relations Board and how it operates. Part Two summarizes the history of Board rulings in regard to graduate students as employees, including the two most recent rulings on the matter, Brown University and Columbia University.

Shelby County v. Holder :: U.S. ___ () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

It further identifies how the two opinions differ beyond their ultimate result. Part Three advocates for Congress to amend the National Labor Relations Act by adding students to the list of groups which are not covered by the Act, effectively denying them the classification of employee.

In making this argument, the Note will point out the flaws of the Columbia University decision, discuss the practical effects of the decision, and explain why the rights of the universities must prevail from a policy standpoint.

Passing of the Act and Mechanics of the Board In passing the National Labor Relations Act inCongress made it a point to explain why it believed the legislation was needed. There is a clear lack of bargaining power, and the remedy they seek is expressly endorsed by the Act.

Generally, almost all private sector employers are regulated by the Act, so long as their activity in interstate commerce exceeds a minimal level. NLRB, where the Supreme Court held hundreds of NLRB rulings invalid, reasoning that at least three members of the Board must sit on the deciding panel for a decision to be legally enforceable.

The process of overturning prior Board rulings is problematic, but constitutional nonetheless. Any ruling on the classification of graduate students as an employee under the Act can and likely will be overturned as soon as a new Board is appointed. In fact, it may have been a goal of Congress to create the Board in such a way that it could not create rigid, binding precedent.

Though only Congress can permanently answer the question of how to treat student-employees, in making its decision Congress would be wise to consider how the Board has handled the issue for the last 45 years.

In pertinent part, the Act defines employee in the following manner: The expressio unius maxim is a subset of the larger interpretation doctrine of textualism.

Both textualist and intentionalist approaches are widely used by judicial bodies, [76] but the overarching question remains: Unlike Courts, administrative agencies are well equipped to legitimately make policy choices.

Accepting that an administrative agency may legitimately promote its policy, [82] textualism seems like an odd vehicle to fulfill that duty. Policy, unlike a statute or the Constitution, is ever-changing, and continually reading statutes under a textualist lens fails to give agencies the opportunity to reflect those changes.

The first, Adelphi University, held that graduate students were not employees of their university; therefore they were not fit to join the rest of the faculty when collectively bargaining. The functions the students performed, they reasoned, were primarily academic with only some faculty-related tasks.

Instead, the reasoning for overturning Leland was borrowed from another decision, Boston Medical Center, which created a new standard of determining employment on the basis of the common law master-servant doctrine.

Brown Versus Columbia — Under the Microscope The two most recent disputes on the matter illustrate where the Board stands now, and what reasoning it used to arrive there.

The cases are factually indistinguishable for all relevant purposes, and the issue is identical. This section attempts to answer that question by identifying the underlying causes. The Board in this instance clearly saw academic sovereignty as a legitimate policy concern.

The final argument that the Board endorsed in Brown is quite distinct from the previous two, and it was not contemplated by the Board in any of the pre-NYU decisions. · The government repaid about US$ million in foreign debt in February At that time, South Africa was considered an under-borrower by conventional financial criteria, with a foreign debt/export ratio of about 60 percent and a foreign debt/GDP ratio of percent, according to South African Reserve Bank march March Issue.

All Articles. The Drowning. is 10 years old, and she has been a member of her family since she was born—first in foster care, then legally adopted just before  · The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is a space telescope that was launched into low Earth orbit in and remains in operation.

Although not the first space telescope, Hubble is one of the largest and most versatile and is well known as both a vital research tool and a Congress responded to DoD’s recommendations by authorizing the disposal of large quantities of 44 NDS materials in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY (DoD, ).

From FY through FY, the stockpile had already disposed of $ million worth of materials (DoD, , )  · The 1st Malaria World Congress has warned that the ‘fight to eliminate malaria is at a crossroads’.

The global ‘declining trend’ has stalled according to the World Health Organisation. Funding has also plateaued: Melbourne seemed an unlikely venue to hold this congress. It is a long way from The US Congress passes the Fifteenth Amendment, giving African-American men, and in theory men of other minorities, the right to vote.

The Amendment reads, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”

AP US Gov and Politics